I have a dream

Today, 50 years ago, Martin Luther King Jr. gave his iconic “I have a dream” speech. Now while King is not necessarily so well known in South Africa, he still stands out as one of the most celebrated political leaders in the past century. I will gladly pay homage to King today by writing a bit about what he did, and more importantly – how.

According to me, King was one of the greatest leaders the world has ever seen, and he might be in my top three civil rights leaders, along with William Wilberforce and Abraham Lincoln. The manner in which King tackled his challenges, and handled his adversaries, is worthy of boundless praise.

Martin Luther King never initiated violent protests or riots, in fact he strongly condemned violence. He rather caused revolution through peaceful protests, shaming the oppressors. Now I know many people will want to hang me for saying this, but in my opinion, the South African struggle heroes fade in comparison to Martin Luther King and what he accomplished. He was a true hero in every sense of the word. He was never seen as a terrorist and never resorted to violence or intimidation – but yet he was successful in what he attempted.

Rather than focussing on King and who he was, I would like to focus on some of the specific “peaceful protests” organized by him, as I believe that in this, we as South Africans have much to learn. I did not write the following text, but got it from an article in the Christian Science Monitor:

1. Montgomery bus boycott, 1955-56

Lasting just over a year, the Montgomery bus boycott was a protest campaign against racial segregation on the public transit system in Montgomery, Ala. The protest began, on Dec. 1, 1955, after African-American Rosa Parks was arrested for refusing to give up her seat on a bus to a white person. The next day, Dr. Kingproposed a citywide boycott of public transportation at a church meeting.

The boycott proved to be effective, causing the transit system to run a huge deficit. After all, Montgomery’s black residents not only were the principal boycotters, but also the bulk of the transit system’s paying customers. The situation became so tense that members of the White Citizens’ Council, a group that opposed racial integration, firebombed King’s house.

In June 1956, a federal court found that the laws in Alabama and Montgomery requiring segregated buses were unconstitutional. However, an appeal kept segregation intact until Dec. 20, 1956, when the US Supreme Courtupheld the district court’s ruling. The boycott’s official end signaled one of the civil rights movement’s first victories and made King one of its central figures.

2. The Albany movement, 1961

The Albany movement was a coalition formed in November 1961 in Albany, Ga., to protest city segregation policies. Dr. King joined in December, planning only to counsel the protesters for one day. Instead, he was jailed during a mass arrest of peaceful demonstrators, and he declined bail until the city changed its segregation policies.

The city made several concessions, and King left jail and then Albany. But he returned the next year to find that little had actually changed. Upon his return, he was convicted of leading the prior year’s protest and sentenced to 45 days in jail or a $178 fine. He chose jail. Three days into King’s sentence, an Albany police chief arranged for his release. The movement eventually dissolved, with few substantial results after nearly a year of continued peaceful protests, but the campaign tested tactics that would shape future protests in the national civil rights movement.

3. The Birmingham campaign, 1963

Lasting about two months in 1963, the Birmingham campaign was a strategic effort started by Dr. King’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference to end discriminatory economic policies in the Alabama city. Some of the protests included boycotting certain businesses that hired only white people or that had segregated restrooms.

When businesses refused to change their policies, protesters held sit-ins and marches, with the aim of getting arrested. King encouraged these nonviolent tactics so that the city’s jails would overflow. Police used high-pressure water hoses and dogs to control protesters, some of whom were children. By the end of the campaign, many segregation signs at Birmingham businesses came down, and public places became more open to all races.

Of the tactic used in the Birmingham campaign, King said, “The purpose of … direct action is to create a situation so crisis-packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation.”

4. March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, 1963

Perhaps Dr. King’s most famous act as a civil rights leader came during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, on Aug. 28, 1963. The largest political rally ever seen in the US, it drew between 200,000 and 300,000 police and participants, to whom King delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

Among other things, the speech advocated racial harmony and economic rights for African-Americans. Observers estimated that nearly 80 percent of the marchers were black.

5. Bloody Sunday, 1965

Dr. King and several other civil rights leaders organized three marches from Selma, Ala., to the state capital of Montgomery, in a bid for voting rights for all.

The first, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, involved nearly 600 protesters who marched east from Selma on US Highway 80, led by Jon Lewis of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and the Rev. Hosea Williams of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. King was not present because he had church duties. But days before, King had met with government officials to try to ensure the marchers would not be impeded. Even so, mob and police violence caused the march to be aborted on that “bloody Sunday.” When film footage of the police brutality was broadcast around the country, it sparked widespread public outrage and helped to boost support for the civil rights movement.

Of the event, King later wrote, “If I had any idea that the state troopers would use the kind of brutality they did, I would have felt compelled to give up my church duties altogether to lead the line.”

King tried to organize another march, but protesters did not succeed in getting to Montgomery until March 25. The speech he delivered that day, on the steps of the state capitol, has since become known as “How Long, Not Long.”

Bloody Sunday was a turning point for the civil rights movement, building public support and clearly demonstrating King’s strategy of nonviolence.

6. Chicago, 1966

After successful demonstrations in the South, Dr. King and other civil rights leaders sought to spread the movement north. They chose Chicago as their next destination to take on black urban problems, especially segregation.

To show his commitment to the northern campaign, King rented an apartment in the slums of North Lawndale on the city’s West Side. One Friday afternoon in August, King led about 700 people on a march in Marquette Park on Chicago’s Southwest Side, a white enclave, to protest housing segregation. Thousands of white people gathered, taunting King and the other protesters. At one point, a brick hit King in the head, but he continued the march as onlookers hurled rocks, bottles, and firecrackers at the marchers. Thirty people, including King, were injured.

Of the Chicago protest, King later said, “I have seen many demonstrations in the South, but I have never seen anything so hostile and hateful as I’ve seen here today.” He continued, “I have to do this – to expose myself – to bring this hate into the open.”


I would like to conclude by giving my own little spin on the Martin Luther King speech:

I have a dream, I have a vision.
A dream of a South Africa where the color of your skin does not determine the opportunities you receive.
A dream of a country where all men are treated equal in every sense of the word.
I have a vision of a South Africa where black and white children can play together in the streets, 
without fear of abduction or rape.
I have a dream of a country where the most vulnerable and innocent are the most protected,
where a baby will be safe in the womb of it’s mother.
I have a dream of a corruption-free government.
I have a vision of a country where foreign nationals are safe, and can work their way to legal citizenship.
I have a dream of equality, where there is no discrimination against the rich, or the poor.
I have a vision of restored pride in being South African.
I have a dream of a country where people obey the law, fear God, and honor their leaders.
I have a dream.
– – – Nico Smit


Tagged: , ,

4 thoughts on “I have a dream

  1. David February 26, 2014 at 12:38 Reply

    Are you a Christian, Nico?

    I ask because I see that you are apparently adamantly opposed to policies such as a minimum wage, which was one of the things Dr King campaigned for. I am wondering just how this part of Dr King’s dream can be realised without minimum wages and increased social spending:

    “A dream of a South Africa where the color of your skin does not determine the opportunities you receive.
    A dream of a country where all men are treated equal in every sense of the word.”

    If you look closely at the few countries that have achieved something close to this level of equality, they are almost all European social democracies with high levels of taxation and high levels of social spending.

    I am puzzled as to why a supposedly mostly Christian country becomes so incredibly selfish when it comes to social spending.


    • Nico Smit February 26, 2014 at 13:01 Reply

      Thanks for the comment David.
      I think if you look at those mentioned European social democracies closely, starting with the UK, you will pick up definite trends:

      – The only way in which a social welfare state can be sustained, initially, is if most of the residents are highly qualified, educated and working. This provides most of the tax money to be redistributed to the poor and needy. In South Africa we have the exact opposite, meaning that our economy can in no way sustain a social welfare state.
      – Examining the countries closely, you will also see that their national debt drastically increases under such policies, because the only way you can sustain non-tax-paying citizens, is through lending the money. Read up a bit on the UK’s national debt, it’s quite scary.
      – Lastly you will also see that a lot of those countries have reached a breaking point, at which it starts cutting on social welfare, because they learn’t that it is not economically sustainable in such quantities. If people can live, eat and commute for free, there is no incentive to study, get educated and/or learn a skill. Heavy social welfare slowly decreases the amount of educated people a country offers. You can already see this happening in South Africa, in spite of our free education system, the students are not inspired to study at all.

      It is not a question of being selfish or of being Christian. It is a question of sustainability. A governments primary reason for existence is not to provide for it’s citizens, but to protect them through enforcing rule of law. Secondarily, it is to create a sustainable economical environment in which the private sector can flourish. Minimum wage is a job killer, and always has been. And increased social welfare encourages non-responsibility.

      It is ironic that Dr. King campaigned for minimum wage… as it was created in the USA by the KKK in order to oppress black people, ensuring that people will always employ white people in stead of blacks. I encourage you to read my references in the minimum wage article, it’s quite fascinating.


      • David February 26, 2014 at 13:52

        If you look at the history of those democracies, they don’t magically become “highly qualified, educated and working”. They became that way precisely because of high social spending. But please feel free to offer another explanation…

        The reason the UK has massive national debt at the moment is not because of its social policies, but because it has bailed out the banks.


        “Heavy social welfare” has not for one moment created a smaller number of educated citizens in countries like Norway, Sweden, Germany…

        “If people can live, eat and commute for free, there is no incentive to study, get educated and/or learn a skill.”

        Our education is not free. Students are charged school fees. And the system continues to suffer terribly from the legacy of apartheid (several generations of ill-educated teachers), mismanagement and under-investment. To give just one example, fewer than 10% of SA schools have libraries… the problem absolutely is not that education is free. Mission education, offered by some of your more generous fellow Christians, and which raised the likes of Mandela was also free. And mission education did not “spoil” people.

        “governments primary reason for existence …is to create a sustainable economical environment in which the private sector can flourish.”

        A sustainable economical environment demands regulation – to create infrastructure, police force, a legal system, breaking up monopolies, stopping pollution and the destruction of other vital common goods.

        Without properly enforced regulation, society becomes a battlefield in which the weak are trampled and the brutal flourish.

        “And increased social welfare encourages non-responsibility.”

        This is not true, contradicted by the actual evidence, such as this:


        “Minimum wage is a killer” – again, not supported by the facts:


        I am still puzzled as to why you set aside what I perhaps naively imagine to be your Christian principles when it comes to social policy. I am not a Christian myself, but I am an admirer of Jesus, and deeply puzzled by how so many Christians manage to find inspiration for a life of selfishness in his example. I cannot think of an instance in which Jesus’ generosity was qualified by “sustainability”. But perhaps you can enlighten me as to how your Christianity informs your politics.


      • Nico Smit February 26, 2014 at 14:43

        Another loaded comment, thanks.
        Honestly, I simply don’t have the time to debate issues online all day. You will see how few posts I actually get around to writing, and how brief my posts are, due to time constraints. Nevertheless, I approved your comment unedited, well knowing I will not reply to every point, as I believe in the sharing of opinion. I will very briefly respond to three points, and after that you will have to forgive me as I will probably not engage in this further, hopefully someone else will?

        First of all, no matter what your standpoint is, you will probably find someone online writing an article in defense of it. So I challenge you to resort to reason and logic, as well as facts.

        – “Minimum wage is a job killer” – read up on the losses in jobs in South Africa 2013, especially in the Agriculture and Mining industries. They strike for higher minimum wage, it gets granted, and directly after that, thousands of workers are fired. It’s basic stats and logic. Go to the big mining companies and farmers and ask them about it, ask any employer of labourers in fact how they will react to a higher minimum wage.

        – All the European social democracies were born from staunch capitalism. So you can’t just attribute the last 100 years in an argument why they are successful today. Take the last 1000 years in consideration, and it will paint another picture. All successful welfare states were born from non-welfare capitalism to get them at a point where they could do so.

        – As far as Christianity and capitalism is concerned. Jesus had very little to say on how government should go about it’s business. In stead His focus was on the kingdom of heaven. Jesus indeed encouraged giving graciously, sacrificing one self and for others, and standing up for the weak. But it’s very important to note that those are ways in which a Christian should behave personally, out of their own choice and free will. Once you impose social welfare on a state, you are forcing taxpayers do that. You are in fact “forcing a religion” on them. Christianity is all about doing good out of your own free will. If you force taxpayers to give to the poor, you are taking away that free will.
        Let me ask you a question: If I were to come into your house, and take 40% of what you have, and then go and distribute it to poor people, will that be morally right? Because that is exactly what a social welfare is. It is the government forcefully (and legally) taking money from you, the taxpayer, and giving it to causes they seem fit. Forcing their “religion” on you. Christianity is about free will.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: